It would be interesting to have an open source app backed by a big company like Panda, but like any software company, the decision to open source would have to be carefully considered. PC world tested Clamwin and didn’t even say what the detection rate was (that bad). On open source, I support open source on everything but antivirus (so far). This is great news and motivates us even more to continue working hard to release a 1.0 version that offers top detection and protection for free is the type of thing: The final detection rate ranking of the full collection of malware, taking into consideration updated sigs and products, is the following: Panda’s app produced an impressive 99.4 percent overall detection rate.įor now, we can’t give Panda’s app a complete score, but its impressive ability to detect malware makes it well worth keeping an eye on. The approach is intended to take advantage of the latest signatures without the need for signature-database updates–and if its excellent showing at detecting malware in ’s zoo of half a million samples is any indication, the approach works. I was recently pointed to a comparative study of free antivirus solutions done by PC World and performed by, comparing Panda Cloud Antivirus, Avira, avast!, Microsoft Security Essentials, AVG, Comodo, PC Tools, and ClamAV.Īltough the editorial did not include Panda Cloud Antivirus in the ranking chart as it could not test the retrospective detection using 2 and 4 week old signatures (as Panda Cloud Antivirus works in the cloud and therefore cannot use 2 & 4 week old signatures), it had this to say about Panda Cloud Antivirus:Īmong all of the free antivirus software we tested for our latest roundup, Panda Cloud Antivirus was the best app at blocking known malware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |